The Senator Who Discovered Social Issues Right Before an Election
Tom Takubo spent months calling for a focus on economics and affordability. Then came the radio ads.
There is a particular kind of political amnesia that strikes West Virginia officeholders right around primary season. Symptoms include the sudden rediscovery of deeply held convictions, a remarkable flexibility on questions one previously found inconvenient, and a radio budget.
Senator Tom Takubo appears to have caught a case.
At the opening of the 2026 legislative session in January, Takubo was plain-spoken about where his priorities lay. “My goal will be to really focus on economic development affordability,” he told WOWK-TV. “We’ve done a lot of great things in the past, but one of the things that we’re kind of losing focus on is how inflation is outpacing what a lot of our people are bringing home.” He pointed to rising utility rates, grocery costs, and healthcare access as the issues demanding legislative attention.
That message fit neatly with the broader coalition Takubo had been building. The Mountaineer Freedom Alliance, the PAC backing Takubo-aligned Senate candidates, was founded explicitly around the same premise. Its founder, David H. McKinley, was direct about the organization’s philosophy when he launched it in April 2025.
“It’s all about jobs. It’s all about advancing the economy,” McKinley told the Weirton Daily Times. “I have little interest in turning to the more divisive social issues that do nothing to advance our economy.” The West Virginia Chamber of Commerce, which contributed $135,000 to the MFA Action Fund, described the organization as a PAC “aimed at supporting lawmakers who champion policies to improve the economy instead of focusing on social issues.”
The MFA published op-eds statewide calling for legislators who could lead West Virginia “without being distracted by partisan politics.” MetroNews confirmed last week that many of the Senate candidates aligned with Takubo “are backed by” the MFA, which “focuses on an economic growth message.”
The message was disciplined, consistent, and repeated across months of candidate recruitment. Whatever one thinks of its merits, it was a clear and coherent pitch: the Senate under Randy Smith’s leadership had its priorities wrong, and the Takubo faction represented a corrective.
So it raised eyebrows when, with the May 12 primary closing in and a serious challenge from former delegate Chris Pritt bearing down on him, Takubo hit the airwaves in his Kanawha County district touting his record on abortion, transgender issues, and Second Amendment rights.
To be clear, there is nothing wrong with running on those issues. West Virginia is a deeply conservative state, and voters care deeply about them. Nobody here is suggesting those concerns are illegitimate or that candidates should avoid them. The WASP is not in the business of telling Republicans what to run on.
But the contrast is worth noting. Not as an indictment of Takubo personally, but as an observation about the gap between a campaign’s pre-primary positioning and its primary-season messaging. The senator who built his recruitment pitch around economics and affordability is now asking voters to judge him on the very issues his allied organization explicitly said it had “little interest” in.
Part of the context matters here. A PAC connected to Senate President Randy Smith attacked Takubo over his 2021 vote against the Save Women’s Sports Act. Takubo’s explanation for that vote has always been defensible on procedural grounds: he supported keeping biological males out of girls’ sports, but objected to extending the bill into college athletics, which he believed fell under NCAA jurisdiction and created unnecessary legal exposure for the state’s law. That was a reasonable position.
The problem is that reasonable procedural distinctions are difficult to compress into a 30-second radio spot. So rather than relitigating the nuance of a five-year-old committee vote, Takubo’s campaign appears to have concluded that the better move is to simply outrun the attack by embracing the terrain wholesale.
That is a rational campaign decision. Campaigns respond to pressure. Candidates adjust their messaging. None of this is unusual in primary politics, and none of it requires imputing bad faith to Takubo about where he actually stands on these issues.
What it does reveal is something broader about the limits of the “economic conservative” messaging strategy in a Republican primary. The base is not indifferent to social issues; they are central to how many voters understand their own political identity. A candidate who builds a coalition around governance and growth can absolutely win, but he still has to answer the litmus test questions when the primary heats up.
Takubo may well win his primary. He has the name recognition, the institutional relationships, and a legitimate record on fiscal matters. But the radio campaign serves as a reminder that in West Virginia Republican primaries, no candidate gets to define the conversation entirely on his own terms, no matter how disciplined the pre-campaign messaging was.
West Virginia voters are good at spotting a weather vane. Whether they read this one as a sincere restatement of convictions or a tactical adjustment to electoral pressure is a judgment they will make for themselves.
That is, after all, the purpose of a primary.
Sources: WOWK-TV (January 2026); Weirton Daily Times (April 2025); WV Chamber of Commerce (January 2026); WV MetroNews (March 24, 2026)
The WV WASP covers West Virginia politics, government, and the occasional absurdity thereof. Subscribe at wvwasp.com. 🐝